Anonymous asked: Ambris, now that you've gone and drawn that nude version of the latest height chart, do you worry that perhaps you've given a bunch of pedophiles fresh fap material? I can't help but be wary of anything that comes close to sexualizing a minor. (There's a reason why such content has to go to shady places like Inkbunny and Derpibooru, after all.)
I can’t even answer that because you jump to the conclusion that foalcon = pedophilia.
Yeah, this isn’t something I feel like talking about.
Oh boy.
(Just a note to Ambris: If you don't feel like talking about it, that's fine. But I'll be talking about it, so you don't need to respond if you don't feel like it.)
I'd like to point out that, while I personally think foalcon/lolicon/shotacon is "slightly pedophilic," I won't consider everyone who's into that sort of stuff a pedophile.
With that being said, though, I have to agree with Anonymous. Based on this post it seems the chart includes the Cutie Mark Crusaders (which I would've guessed), who are underage. So actually, even if foalcon isn't the same as pedophilia, this would still have "given a bunch of pedophiles fresh fap material."
Anonymous also correctly points out that Tumblr does not allow such content, which is why it must be moved to such sites as, indeed, Inkbunny and Derpibooru. (By the way, I don't think those sites are "shady" as Anonymous put it, but rather "less restrictive.")
I'll discuss my views on foalcon/lolicon/shotacon more broadly in another post. Right now I'm only addressing Anonymous's points here.