Skip to Content

In re solarhedonist on Fausticorn Rule 34 (Link with Image) [Link]

http://notaclopbanana.tumblr.com/post/78874419322/sending-out-an-sos-with-clop-perfection

solarhedonist:

heartlinda:

needs-more-plot:

Considering it’s her personal OC, and therefore HER, I think it’s incredibly wrong to make porn of her OC. Not to mention that she has gone on record as being incredibly creeped out at the idea.

Please have some respect, people.

I understand what you’re saying, but I wonder if it’s any different from pornographic depictions (“Rule 34”) of real celebrities. (They are out there.) I’m sure they would be creeped out by it just the same, so does that mean they should be given the same respect? Similarly, I’m sure most proprietors of entertainment franchises are creeped out by Rule 34; what does that say about such content as clop in general?

I’m not supportive of Fausticorn/VA OC clop; I’m just asking some questions.

((Jumping in… I think the line is when it’s a depiction of the individual. The OCs of the cast and crew should be off limits, especially to vile things like I’ve seen. I’ve seen Fausticorn raped. Multiple times, some including bloody torture. It’s out there. It’s horribly wrong.

Yes, celebrities should be given the same respect since in the case of live action, the character they play looks exactly like them most of the time… especially nude. 

Fictional characters are a different realm, but even then I think /some/ respect is needed. Let’s not have clop of murder porn for example. There are lines, and while fictional characters aren’t real, they still deserve some limits to how they’re treated by anyone that isn’t their creator/owner.))

This seems like a good standard.

(Hm…I’ve mostly seen cartoon-type Rule 34 of celebrities, though I admit I haven’t seen that much. But I suppose that doesn’t really matter.)