Tag: Discussion

quiet-dominant:

submissivefeminist:

wearethefracturedskies:

okay

today i wore a v-neck to school, something that is totally normal for 99% of the girls there, one of the girls in my french class was wearing one similar to mine in fact.

but my french teacher came up to me and told me that i was out of dress code and that i was asking for something to happen to me.

and all day long i had to slap guys who found it perfectly okay to grab them.

im a 32DDD, 5’1, and 115 pounds. due to this im known around the school as the walking boobs, the girl who grew in other places, and BITS. I constantly get called a whore and a tease. 

Girls are always accusing their boyfriends of sleeping with me.

and there have been times when i have had to tell teachers that my eyes are up here.

i grew boobs in the eighth grade, i was a DD then, and i cant tell you how many fights i got into with guys who thought it was alright to stick their faces in them. 

the point of all of this is that its bullshit. 

i should be able to wear a v neck to school without worrying about who is going to grab my boobs next, or who is going to throw a gum wrapper in them, or what girls are going to say next.

Fuck that shit! I would report any teacher that needs to be reminded not to stare at your chest. That is not okay in any sense.

Also, I’d say screw slut-shaming, but this isn’t even a matter of dressing how one wants, but a matter of a woman’s natural state being the reason that men think it’s okay to sexual harass or assault her.

• Large breasts are not an invitation.
• Large breasts are not an invitation.
• LARGE BREASTS ARE NOT AN INVITATION.

Are we clear?

xx SF

Reblog and Amplify.

notableclopblog:

puddincakes:

The fan base is HUGE! There’s so much out there for it and I’ve always been curious about it. The show is targeting small children yet there’s a much bigger adult fan base.
I’m 19 and it old my 9 year old sister I liked my little pony and she laughed at me and called me a baby. (She loves it now)
So why do you like clop? MLP porn? I’m just curious and don’t judge at all.

A lot of people were introduced to mlp through clop. There are a lot of artists who do R34 exclusively or almost exclusively and when they make fanart of something they’ll draw what they know. This is how I was introduced to the show. Other than that the show itself is heavily neotenized and more anthropormphized than previous generations as well as the bed room eyes, plot, and happy accidents that happen in the animation.

In re puddincakes: Interesting question. Well, I enjoy many types of Rule 34, but clop has its own way of getting to me. (In re notableclopblog: I personally was introduced to the show through safe-for-work means.)

First let’s note that MLP:FiM has many female characters, which is expected since they were designed to appeal to young girls; add to this the fact that the main six are very close friends. It’s very easy to imagine that they take it one step further. Many do this through shipping; fan work can be found for all fifteen possible parings among the main six. Perverts like me take it another step further with clop. (And clop can also be found for all fifteen pairings.)

The art style also plays a role. Very human facial expressions play a role, as in the “wet mane” meme, as well as the anatomy: Their legs and hooves are very wide compared to those of real horses, and to be frank I’ll say that artists’ attempts to make their forms more equine turn me off.

(This is mainly about clop. If you’re following me for other content, you can ignore this.)

I’ve come across some NSFW blogs of bronies I know (mostly from YouTube).

• LaserPon3 (dedicated NSFW blog) (found just by browsing #clop)
• General Mumble (also dedicated) (also found through #clop)
• d.notive (tagged) (description advises that the blog is “frequently NSFW”; I just searched the logical tag)
• Silva Hound (tagged) (not a good example, actually)
• PaleoSteno (dedicated NSFW blog) (linked from his main one)

Okay, people like porn; that’s not too big a problem. The problem is that there’s clop. Given the sometimes strained relationship between cloppers and the brony fandom as a whole, I wonder how they manage to do (read: get away with) this.

Are most bronies much more tolerant of cloppers then I thought? Or maybe these blogs are all for lulz?

I have a “main” (SFW) account for pony stuff (not Tumblr [yet, anyway]), so I’m wondering if I should start being more open about this.

c-d-e:

heartlinda:

c-d-e:

sturmtruppen:

okay this is for sure the most adorable celestia

wrapping your body around someone passed out drunk who can’t consent… is non-consentual sexual assault…

I might agree with c-d-e, but it’s hard to tell if Celestia’s actually touching her in intimate areas. Still great advice from askconsentia, though!

That’s a flaw in logic. Sexual assault doesn’t require just touching genitals or secondary sexual organs. Rubbing someones leg, their feet, their hair, can be sexual assault. Spooning IS sexual assault when someone can’t consent, ESPECIALLY if that someone is blackout drunk!

I understand that. I said “intimate” areas, and that term is intentionally left up for interpretation. If those areas you listed are “intimate” (and I would think so, actually), then it is sexual assault.

Recently I’ve been seening quite a few blogs getting shut down for sexual depictions of underage characters (albeit only fictional ones). In response to people who object to Tumblr staff for doing so, I’d like to say that this is justified.

While I think this sort of material is somewhat pedophilic and therefore avoid posting it, even if those who post it do not have ethical concerns, Tumblr still has its Community Guidelines that prohibit “harm to minors.” So the site is well within its power to remove such content.

Granted, I’m not the one reporting these blogs, but I think this is something to keep in mind if you post such material.

You can access this through the short URL /t/konpurekkusu (“konpurekkusu” [katakana コンプレックス] being the Japanese translation/transliteration of “complex” in such terms as “lolicon” [“Lolita complex”]).

c-d-e:

sturmtruppen:

okay this is for sure the most adorable celestia

wrapping your body around someone passed out drunk who can’t consent… is non-consentual sexual assault…

I might agree with c-d-e, but it’s hard to tell if Celestia’s actually touching her in intimate areas. Still great advice from askconsentia, though!

I’m backing out of the “Down with Molestia” controversy. I’ve made my views clear. (You can see all the posts I’ve made here. This is also linked at the top my blog. [Update: I have removed the link.]) There’s not much more I can respond to without repeating myself. Also, this has pretty much replaced my regular content on this blog for the past few days. It’s time to get back.

I will still have other discussions, and I may jump back in later if something major happens.

Wherever you stand, I hope you continue to promote your views and engage rationally and civilly. (And if you haven’t been doing so, I hope you start!)

/t/post/58706472018/heartlinda-discussion-down-with-molestia-free

I didn’t want to reblog sheeparts’ post again, so I sent something to his ask box. But he probably won’t answer, seeing as I might have spammed him with so many responses.

Yes, free speech does also give the “Down with Molestia” campaign the right to call for the removal of “Ask Princess Molestia.” But the same question must be asked about DM as about APM: Even though DM has the right, should they?

I’m leaning toward an answer of “no” since John Joseco is still protected by free speech (and it seems sheeparts agrees on this).

However, I would encourage people to continue speaking out against APM’s rape jokes and their defenders. Using this as a catalyst for awareness of rape and sexual abuse is also a good idea. I think this is a better way to approach it. I’ve seen some fan art, and I think that making it is great.

I guess you could say this: I defend the blog, but not what is in the blog.

/t/post/58704416542/discussion-down-with-molestia-free-speech

sheeparts:

heartlinda:

I’ve seen many responses to the “free speech” argument for “Ask Princess Molestia” to the tune of, “It trivializes rape and harms rape victims.” I get that. It’s offensive and harmful.

However, that has no bearing on free speech. Free speech protects even offensive speech, as long as it does not…

Free speech also covers our criticism of the blog and our calls to have it taken down. It’s a really, really broad concept.

Of course. I’m sure some would want WBC to stop as well, but neither of these should be forced. If you manage to convince John Joseco to take down the blog, that’s great.

I’ve seen many responses to the “free speech” argument for “Ask Princess Molestia” to the tune of, “It trivializes rape and harms rape victims.” I get that. It’s offensive and harmful.

However, that has no bearing on free speech. Free speech protects even offensive speech, as long as it does not directly incite violence. Free speech means people have the right to be rude, bigoted, racist, sexist, and even rape-apologetic.

The next question is: Should they be? Of course not! But this is a different matter altogether.

To illustrate this distinction, take a look at the Westboro Baptist Church. You might have heard of it. It’s a church in Kansas, United States that regularly protests against gay people with the slogan “God hates fags” and even goes so far as to say that terrorist attacks on the United States (including 9/11!) are God’s punishment for tolerating homosexuals.

It’s clear that WBC’s speech is hateful and bigoted. It has the potential to harm victims of anti-LGBT violence. But as much as I disagree with WBC and its activities, I would not try to stop them since they are protected by free speech.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” —S.G. Tallentyre, The Friends of Voltaire, illustrating Voltaire’s view on free speech