Fluttershy. I’ve seen quite a few of these before.
#5: RULES WARNING. That seems pretty painful.
- Eh, I’m not a fan of this pose.
- Eugh, anal beads. Always a bit unsettling.
- Interesting concept! (Though, I wonder what happened that led up to this.)
- More anal beads, and she looks exhausted.
- I don’t get the “sexy nurse” concept. I never do.
- Have some random Berry Punch, I guess.
- Ooh, I like this anthropomorphization!
- Really?
- The “sexy maid” is like the sexy nurse. I never get it.
- RULES VIOLATION. Non-consent.
I’m backing out of the “Down with Molestia” controversy. I’ve made my views clear. (You can see all the posts I’ve made here. This is also linked at the top my blog. [Update: I have removed the link.]) There’s not much more I can respond to without repeating myself. Also, this has pretty much replaced my regular content on this blog for the past few days. It’s time to get back.
I will still have other discussions, and I may jump back in later if something major happens.
Wherever you stand, I hope you continue to promote your views and engage rationally and civilly. (And if you haven’t been doing so, I hope you start!)
/t/post/58706472018/heartlinda-discussion-down-with-molestia-free
I didn’t want to reblog sheeparts’ post again, so I sent something to his ask box. But he probably won’t answer, seeing as I might have spammed him with so many responses.
Yes, free speech does also give the “Down with Molestia” campaign the right to call for the removal of “Ask Princess Molestia.” But the same question must be asked about DM as about APM: Even though DM has the right, should they?
I’m leaning toward an answer of “no” since John Joseco is still protected by free speech (and it seems sheeparts agrees on this).
However, I would encourage people to continue speaking out against APM’s rape jokes and their defenders. Using this as a catalyst for awareness of rape and sexual abuse is also a good idea. I think this is a better way to approach it. I’ve seen some fan art, and I think that making it is great.
I guess you could say this: I defend the blog, but not what is in the blog.
/t/post/58704416542/discussion-down-with-molestia-free-speech
I’ve seen many responses to the “free speech” argument for “Ask Princess Molestia” to the tune of, “It trivializes rape and harms rape victims.” I get that. It’s offensive and harmful.
However, that has no bearing on free speech. Free speech protects even offensive speech, as long as it does not…
Free speech also covers our criticism of the blog and our calls to have it taken down. It’s a really, really broad concept.
Of course. I’m sure some would want WBC to stop as well, but neither of these should be forced. If you manage to convince John Joseco to take down the blog, that’s great.
Let me guess, it got blocked for foalcon, right? (Kinda like the blog that is now notableclopblog? By the way, you were never following me before.) Or did they voluntarily leave?
If it’s the former case, are they up again?