Tag: Futanari

Oh jeez, this turned out way longer than I expected!

On terminology: “Dickgirl” (or perhaps the rhyming “chicks with dicks”) is probably the most precise term to refer to what is being discussed here. I know that I use “androgyny” as well, but that refers to a much wider range of characteristics, some of which have nothing to do with anatomy.

This discussion is mainly inspired by an answer by needs-more-plot about why he enjoys this, reiterated when he describes “vicariously identifying…with the phallus in an image”. Essentially, he seems (based on these posts) to fantasize that the penis that is receiving pleasure is his.

Okay, I get that. But I disagree in terms of my personal preferences as a heterosexual male.

But first, some general commentary about guys being obsessed with penises.
This post highlights this obsession, and I thought it’d be fitting to respond here because it connects with the main subject.
I’ve never been obsessed with penises in the ways teenage boys are stereotypically. I guess the dominance theory is closest to what I’ve thought. The correlation between phallus length and dominance is an interesting point that I’ll bring up later.

Although I’m not obsessed in the stereotypical ways, I absolutely love dickgirls. One of my main pleasures is seeing a woman pleasured. A woman for me isn’t defined by her genitalia. In pornography, the factor on which I mostly rely is the figure (including breasts). So I get off especially to women getting off, you could say. (When I see a woman masturbating, I don’t imagine myself doing anything to her.)

The thing about penises is that I know what a penis feels like (rather obviously), so it’s easy to imagine what a woman with a penis feels. That’s it.

Well, that was it originally. The thing about penis length now comes in when I think about this drawing (clop, of a feral-form futanari Twilight Sparkle, by Boltswift). Her phallus is the same thickness as her hoof (not outlandish, but still pretty big and pushing the boundaries of reasonability). I’ll be honest right now: My main fantasy concerning this depiction is slowly running my tongue along the entire length of her phallus and listening to her moaning and panting… I wouldn’t properly fellate her, though. (Besides, I doubt I could in this case.)

Coming back from saucy to serious, I believe the length attraction isn’t due to “vicarious dominance”; it’s just because there’s more to pleasure.

needs-more-plot:

solarhedonist:

needs-more-plot:

Submitted to me by anon.

This is video is fascinating. It’s discussion on an observational study about common sexual kinks in humans.

Among many other things, it pretty much says exactly what I already thought: Men in general are obsessed with dicks, despite traditional thought. In fact, men are more obsessed with dicks than women are! This includes completely hetero men in general (though they’ll be hard pressed to admit it.)

((It was proven some time ago by cameras that measured where a person’s eyes pointed that men glance at another man’s crotch way, way more often than women look at either gender’s crotches. This of course being during fully clothed conversation.

It’s also proven that men think about the dicks of other men quite a lot. However, I would put forward that there is a significant different between obsessive thought and sexual attraction. Most men who identify as heterosexual cannot masturbate to gay porn even if they try. However, a large cock is vital for straight men to enjoy straight porn. Why is this? It’s fairly obvious… they aren’t obsessing over other men’s dicks in the video, they are vicariously imagining the featured cock to be their own. If that cock is pounding a pussy, great, because that’s what they want to do. If it’s pounding another guy’s ass, it doesn’t work, because that isn’t what they want to do themselves.

So, why think about other guy’s dicks in a non-sexual setting then? Simple. Dominance. Like it or not, the deeper a guy can leave his seed in a woman the more likely impregnation is. It’s a slight difference, but it is a difference. Guys with longer dicks, therefore, are slightly more likely to successfully mate. The ancient monkey part of the human male’s brain, the part most of us (men and women) are unaware of as it goes about it’s monkey life, knows this and is constantly questioning its own order in the dick size hierarchy.

It’s stupid, yes, but it by no means indicates that all guys want to suck a cock (other than their own… pretty sure most guys would if they could). There isn’t some vast conspiracy against being bi or an organized mass denial of homosexual urges. Plenty of women obsess over the breasts of other women. Doesn’t mean they’re bi or lesbian. There’s far more at work here than just sex.))

Oh yeah, you are absolutely right. You put into words what I’ve always thought.

Straight guys are obsessed with dicks. Why else do they make jokes/talk about them all the time? Guys are obsessed with drawing a phallus on every single canvas they can manage. It’s not a sexual obsession, I know. But it’s a obsession anyway.

And I think the reason why guys generally like dickgirls in porn is because of getting the female triggers of curves, but also having a phallus to vicariously live through.

Reblogging for the record. Note that I’m going TL;DW on this video for now.

perfectfuta:

thefutaqueen:

Let it be known, now and forever; I will not under any reason post anymore stupid questions/comments like this again.

To tell someone they have to be part of a “club” to say a certain word is retard and slightly insane. I’ll tell ya what, I’ll stop “Objectifying” trans women when people like you stop being Fascist.

Little neo-nazi(s) like you are doing more  harm to the trans community then good. What is futanari if not  a huge parade of trans artwork, a fan base? Sure, is not something you see hanging in a gallery, but to many people (Including transsexual and transgendered people) it is something they can connect with. Something they can put themselves into. Futanari artwork is the stepping stones of acceptance, do you know how many male followers this blog has? Each and everyone of them would accept a trans woman into their life with open arms, why? Because they like futanari, because they think traps are cute, because they have seen it done before. I think you need to get over yourself and deal with it, “Some people are Futa, get over it!”

To add on to this, futanari is an art form, and one that - by definition - is a form of satire and parody. It does not surprise me (nor should it surprise anyone) that satire will tend to offend, to unnerve, to isolate and, yes, to objectify.

This is what this sub-strata of parody art forms is supposed to do. “Furry,” for instance, is a parody of bestiality (imagine a photo-realistic artistic rendering of furry sex and you’ll be hard pressed to find where the line is any more). It is supposed to take the unfamiliar, the sacred (and what is more sacred in our lives than gender identity?) and force us to re-evaluate our assumptions of what we are, what we think, and how we react to others around us who may not be exactly like us. 

The fact that futanari art also arouses, titillates, or otherwise creates the desire to sexualize another person is a fantastic bonus; embrace the discomfort of getting outside of the comfort zone of what is plain vanilla (or habitual) in our every day sex lives. 

If Futa creates a redefinition of gender, I say, “Good!” Challenge the norm - even the norm of those who are trying to challenge the ‘norm’ by being futa-like in real life. No one holds a monopoly of what the ‘norm’ should be changed to. 

That is, after all, the wonder and power of art in the first place.

-PF

Okay, on terminology: “Futanari” is the best term for this sort of thing because (in short) “transgender” doesn’t include individuals who are/are said to be born with such traits, and “androgynous” is too broad.

I personally do not seek to objectify these individuals (well, any more than pornography does by its own nature). I actually hate certain images I’ve seen that seem stereotype futanari individuals as sex-obsessed.

I also like the analyses already provided.

ambris-waifu-hoard:

I’m about the same way. I used to think that one had to be bi to like futa. But then I was informed otherwise, and they explained it to me like this:

It’s about having a penis to identify with. I find that in porn, having a phallus in the art gives me something to relate to in the picture. While a picture can be arousing without, there is definitely something extra in a drawing with a dick somewhere. It allows me/you to pretend that’s yours there, which is always awesome for fantasizing.

This is why I actually prefer M/F porn to F/F. The lack of a penis is actually something that takes away from it. You want to be the Male who is having sex with the Female.

Futa of that style is basically a single character who is both. She’s a girl, and that makes her arousing. But she’s also enjoying the same bit of anatomy you”re familiar with. A non-futa girl masturbating is certainly arousing too; but as a guy, you don’t really know what that feels like, so there is a bit of a disconnect.

That feeling of pleasure comes from a character enjoying their own anatomy can translate to yourself. She simultaneously is the desire, as well as your avatar. I find the same dynamic can also work with a Futa girl having sex with another girl, futa or not.

But ultimately, you’re straight. So gay porn doesn’t do anything for you, because while there are plenty of dicks for you to identify with, there is nothing in it for you to desire.

It’s a very strange dynamic, I’ll admit. And it’s why at least some straight guys like futa. I can’t claim that’s why all do. And certainly there are those who are not straight who like futa for more obvious reasons. :p

I hope that makes sense!

Wow, well said.

I agree with this for the most part, but I think I could add to this for my personal views. Maybe I'll make a post on it.